UPDATES
Register, sign in, and link your telemetry device to claim your pilot profile.Landing history, charts, and threshold-distance tracking are now available in your account.Best Pilot leaderboard requires at least 5 qualifying landings.Register, sign in, and link your telemetry device to claim your pilot profile.Landing history, charts, and threshold-distance tracking are now available in your account.Best Pilot leaderboard requires at least 5 qualifying landings.
Adolfo Suárez Madrid–Barajas Airport (LEMD) satellite view — MSFS airport on BeatMyLand.ing

Landing Summary

CO2: 254.8 kg CO2
Runway SlammerOverall: Gear Tester
Airport
Adolfo Suárez Madrid–Barajas Airport
Runway
RWY 14L
Landing runway at touchdown
Zulu Time
18:18Z
2026-07-05

Firm but controlled touchdown with excellent rollout control and weak centerline discipline.

That one definitely made the gear earn its keep.

Tip: Reduce descent rate slightly before touchdown.

Touchdown -301 FPMMax G 1.38 G
Aircraft EC-MUK photo via Planespotters
Photo: Ewan Partridge View source

Fenix A320 - Iberia Express 'Standard' EC-MUK (2025)

165.49
Score
165.49
Needs Work
17%
Comfort
17%
Coffee may have spilled
Share to Reddit

Want to show off the landing? Share it with the community on r/BeatMyLanding.

Flight Context

These conditions influenced the landing result.

Wind
4.0 kt
Light crosswind had limited effect on touchdown control.
3.2 kt headwind
Runway Slope
-0.96%
Runway slope likely changed the visual touchdown cues.
Slope-adjusted runway picture at touchdown.

Landing Breakdown

What happened at touchdown.

Needs Work

Touchdown FPM

-301 FPM
Firm

Airliner touchdown is firm but still within a normal landing envelope.

-301 FPM
280420

Max G

1.38 G
Hard

High touchdown load. The landing felt harsh on impact.

Higher G = harder landing.

1.38 G
1.101.201.30

Bounces

0
Perfect

No bounce detected after touchdown.

0
12+

Centerline offset (touchdown)

96.3 ft
Misaligned

Far from the runway centerline at touchdown.

Touchdown instant only — rollout lateral drift is graphed below. Scoring applies an 8 ft neutral corridor before centerline penalty.

96.3 ft
8 ft15 ft

Runway Axis Diff

1.5°
Aligned

Aircraft was aligned with the runway heading at touchdown.

1.5°

Sideslip

1.8°
Stable

Touchdown drift was well controlled.

1.8°

Rollout Stability

100 / 100
Excellent

Minimal heading and bank instability was detected after touchdown.

100
7090

Threshold Distance (TDZ)

+6922 ft
Late

Touchdown happened outside the touchdown zone.

+6922 ft
ThresholdTDZ End

Threshold Crossing Height

57.6 ft
On Profile

Approach crossed the threshold at a safe training height.

57.6 ft
10 ft20 ft30 ftSafe floor

Scoring

Full breakdown used for this landing.

165.49

Base Score: 82.02

Difficulty Multiplier (credit): ×1.019

Touchdown Rate Penalty: 48.16

G Penalty: 3.50

Bounce Penalty: 0.00

Centerline Penalty: 28.26

Runway Axis Penalty: 2.10

Touchdown Zone (TDZ) Penalty: 0.00

Low Threshold Penalty: 0.00 (57.6 ft)

Sideslip Penalty: 0.00

Rollout Stability Penalty: 0.00

Telemetry Replay

How the landing unfolded, from touchdown to rollout.

Touchdown Profile

Vertical speed and G-force around touchdown

Touchdown FPM
-301 FPM
Max G-Force
1.38G
Landing Type
Hard
Flare Timing
Late
Higher G = harder landing
This window includes a steeper -456 FPM sample; the graded touchdown above uses -301 FPM.
Late flare resulted in a firmer touchdown.
ApproachTouchdownRollout

Runway Centerline Deviation (After Touchdown)

Distance from runway centerline during rollout

Started
96.3 ft right of centerline
Ended
85.9 ft right of centerline
Centerline Control
Needs Work
Correction
Smooth
Lateral Trend
Right side - correcting left (towards centerline)
Max Deviation
97.2 ft
Stayed right of centerline but corrected slightly toward center.
Did not reach centerline during rollout.