UPDATES
Register, sign in, and link your telemetry device to claim your pilot profile.Landing history, charts, and threshold-distance tracking are now available in your account.Best Pilot leaderboard requires at least 5 qualifying landings.Register, sign in, and link your telemetry device to claim your pilot profile.Landing history, charts, and threshold-distance tracking are now available in your account.Best Pilot leaderboard requires at least 5 qualifying landings.
Hartsfield Jackson Atlanta International Airport (KATL) satellite view — MSFS airport on BeatMyLand.ing

Landing Summary

CO2: 4.69 t CO2
Runway SlammerOverall: Gear Tester
Airport
Hartsfield Jackson Atlanta International Airport
Runway
RWY 26R
Landing runway at touchdown
Zulu Time
21:28Z
2026-05-16

Firm but controlled touchdown with excellent rollout control and weak centerline discipline.

That one definitely made the gear earn its keep.

Tip: Reduce descent rate slightly before touchdown.

Touchdown -307 FPMMax G 1.55 G
Aircraft Airbus A320 Neo (A32NX) Hong Kong Express (2023 Livery) photo via beatmyland_bundled_asobo
Default image (bundled MSFS / Asobo type art) View source

Airbus A320 Neo (A32NX) Hong Kong Express (2023 Livery)

LiveryHong Kong Express (2023 Livery)

72.86
Score
72.86
Needs Work
65%
Comfort
65%
Passengers noticed the landing
Share to Reddit

Want to show off the landing? Share it with the community on r/BeatMyLanding.

Flight Context

These conditions influenced the landing result.

Wind
0.6 kt
Light crosswind had limited effect on touchdown control.
2.3 kt headwind
Runway Slope
0.17%
Slight runway slope may have influenced the flare picture.
Slope-adjusted runway picture at touchdown.

Landing Breakdown

What happened at touchdown.

Needs Work

Touchdown FPM

-307 FPM
Firm

Airliner touchdown is firm but still within a normal landing envelope.

-307 FPM
280420

Max G

1.55 G
Hard

High touchdown load. The landing felt harsh on impact.

Higher G = harder landing.

1.55 G
1.101.201.30

Bounces

0
Perfect

No bounce detected after touchdown.

0
12+

Centerline offset (touchdown)

53.5 ft
Misaligned

Far from the runway centerline at touchdown.

Touchdown instant only — rollout lateral drift is graphed below. Scoring applies an 8 ft neutral corridor before centerline penalty.

53.5 ft
8 ft15 ft

Runway Axis Diff

1.2°
Aligned

Aircraft was aligned with the runway heading at touchdown.

1.2°

Sideslip

1.6°
Stable

Touchdown drift was well controlled.

1.6°

Rollout Stability

96 / 100
Excellent

Minimal heading and bank instability was detected after touchdown.

96
7090

Threshold Distance (TDZ)

+2043 ft
In Zone

Touchdown landed inside the touchdown zone.

+2043 ft
ThresholdTDZ End

Threshold Crossing Height

56.0 ft
On Profile

Approach crossed the threshold at a safe training height.

56.0 ft
10 ft20 ft30 ftSafe floor

Scoring

Full breakdown used for this landing.

72.86

Base Score: 73.11

Difficulty Multiplier (credit): ×1.003

Touchdown Rate Penalty: 49.12

G Penalty: 7.75

Bounce Penalty: 0.00

Centerline Penalty: 14.56

Runway Axis Penalty: 1.68

Touchdown Zone (TDZ) Penalty: 0.00

Low Threshold Penalty: 0.00 (56.0 ft)

Sideslip Penalty: 0.00

Rollout Stability Penalty: 0.00

Telemetry Replay

How the landing unfolded, from touchdown to rollout.

Touchdown Profile

Vertical speed and G-force around touchdown

Touchdown FPM
-307 FPM
Max G-Force
1.39G
Landing Type
Hard
Flare Timing
Late
Higher G = harder landing
This window includes a steeper -1030 FPM sample; the graded touchdown above uses -307 FPM.
Late flare resulted in a firmer touchdown.
ApproachTouchdownRollout

Runway Centerline Deviation (After Touchdown)

Distance from runway centerline during rollout

Started
53.5 ft right of centerline
Ended
18.5 ft right of centerline
Centerline Control
Needs Work
Correction
Smooth
Lateral Trend
Right side - correcting left (towards centerline)
Max Deviation
53.5 ft
Stayed right of centerline but corrected slightly toward center.
Did not reach centerline during rollout.